CETL Workshop
Vista Sessions
January 9, 10, 11, 2007
Evaluation Results
![]()
|
| Number of participants = 33
(info about
participants) Number of evaluation respondents = 17 |
Original survey can be viewed at http://hercules.gcsu.edu/agrubb/Vista07Eval.htm |
| 12% of respondents are part-time Instructors (2) 5% of respondents are full-time Instructors (1) 41% of respondents are Assistant Professors (7) 18% of respondents are Associate Professors (3) 24% of respondents are Professors (4) |
41% of respondents are in
School of Liberal Arts & Sciences (7) 29% of respondents are in School of Health Sciences (5) 6% of respondents are in School of Education (1) 18% of respondents are in School of Business (3) 6% of respondents are librarians (1) |
100% of participants agreed or strongly agreed the workshop content was relevant to them. (3.6 out of 4)
81% of participants agreed or strongly
agreed the workshop pace was appropriate. (3.1 out of 4)
100% of participants disagreed or strongly disagreed the workshop material was
too difficult. (1.6 out of 4)
75% of participants disagreed or strongly disagreed the workshop material was too easy (2.2 out of 4)
100% of participants agreed or strongly agreed they would employ workshop content in their teaching. (3.5 out of 4)
81% of participants agreed or strongly agreed the facilitators were effective. (3.2 out of 4)
88% of participants agreed or strongly agreed they would recommend this workshop to others. (3.3 out of 4)
94% of participants agreed or strongly agreed they felt confident they could employ information learned. (3.1 out of 4)
Note - Scoring was based on a 4-point scale:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Agree
4=Strongly Agree
![]()
When asked to "describe one aspect of the session you will incorporate into your teaching," respondents identified the following:
|
I love the syllabus feature! | |
|
As I teach online, I will use every aspect of this workshop! | |
|
Online postings. | |
|
For starters: student presentations all in Vista accessible to everybody. | |
|
I will use blended learning in my current class, thanks to the fact that GCSU has already imported the names of my students and to the possibility of getting minimal functions. | |
|
I will use the aspects of WebCT that I find useful. | |
|
Use of syllabus tool. | |
|
Use of Vista to develop syllabus. | |
|
Implementing Vista for my courses. | |
|
Use of Teach section. | |
|
Use of Vista/View. | |
|
Posting notes, discussions, resources. | |
|
I was suprised that Vista looks to be a significant improvement on WebCT. Now all we need is for it to start working! I will still wait until summer before using it for my courses. | |
|
I will be using all of this information in developing a web site and materials for a web site. |
Respondents indicated the following incidental learning as a result of the session:
|
How much easier it is to navigate Vista. | |
|
Strategies for online classes. | |
|
How much boredom and slowness some trainers can incorporate into a workshop. The material covered was not worth 3 hours; it should have been condensed into an hour or less. This joker obviously does not have enough to do, so he decided to waste our time for the day. I hate to think how much we paid him for such SLOW instruction. | |
|
Define assets of Vista in addition to traditional teaching. | |
|
Got good individual help from the presenter. | |
|
Ease of access to student view. | |
|
How crippled the system is when the server is not working well. | |
|
Nothing. | |
|
That Vista does have a full-text search component to it. | |
|
Availability of resources. | |
|
How to upload to the website. | |
|
What the training did for me is this...it showed me that Vista is slower than a snail, grossly unstable and unreliable. There's no way in heck that I'll use it until they get the bugs out. Too bad, it would be a great tool for outside-of-class group work. |
Respondents indicated the following learning needs AFTER the training:
|
Unsure at present. | |
|
Online test creation. | |
|
Examples of student success that has been enhanced as a result of this technology. | |
|
Foreign language content already available; Horizon Live Classroom/Illuminate Live Classroom. | |
|
Module design. | |
|
Matching teaching strategies to learning objectives. | |
|
Going through the entire process of creating a WebCT VISTA site from beginning to end. | |
|
I would have liked to have had a list of vocabulary - and then definitions (so I could know what Vista calls things). | |
|
Just more practice time. |
Respondents offered the following suggestions to improve the session:
| The problem with our workshop was the slow response of Vista. This was beyond the trainer's control. | |
| The computer problems encountered was not in your control - this made learning very difficult. I really expected to have more done in the 3 hour time - I had also completed the online course, so I have spent some considerable time with this subject and still feel inadequate with it. This is somewhat frustrating. Thanks for caring. | |
| The server was down. :( | |
| Condense it to one hour. | |
| Make sure Vista site works. Communicate better to faculty to bring "real" work. | |
| I was distracted by the number of typos on the screen. At first, I thought it was a teaching technique, so that we would learn how to edit. It wasn't. | |
| The guest knew how to explain the most important stuff quickly. | |
| If computer system is not working, abort class and reschedule. | |
| Needed less of the overview and more time spent with the module concept. We spent too long with the general stuff and have a very rushed last 20 minutes in the session I attended. | |
| The content was well presented. I believe it was helpful to me to have completed the online sessions before attending. | |
| Spend more time on the instructor tools and much less time looking at Vista from the student point of view. | |
| It was well done with many facilitators to help each participant. |